
How we assess insurers
The analytical framework, evidence standards and signal sources behind the platform, as they are applied today. Where a practice is planned rather than in place, this page says so.
A
What we assess
Each company is assessed in four steps, from how it makes money to what the evidence implies. The same evidence standard applies at every step.
01
Establish the operating economics
Principal questions
- How does the company earn revenue, and on what accounting basis is it reported?
- How profitable is its underwriting, and how much of its profit comes from fees, spread or investment income?
- What is its business and geographic mix?
Metrics
- Scale and revenue: Insurance revenue (IFRS 17), gross written premiums, premiums written (US GAAP), each with its basis stated
- Earnings: Net income attributable to shareholders; operating result as the company defines it
- Underwriting: Combined ratio, with its definition (discounted or undiscounted, with or without reserve releases)
- Life and retirement: Life operating result, new business value, contractual service margin
- Returns: Return on equity as the company defines it
Evidence required
Annual and interim reports, results releases and investor presentations of the company itself.
02
Examine the balance sheet and capital
Principal questions
- What liabilities does the company carry, and how are its assets invested?
- How strong is its capital position under its regulatory regime, and how much capital does it generate?
- How has it deployed capital: dividends, buybacks, acquisitions, reinsurance and portfolio transfers?
Metrics
- Solvency and capital position: Solvency II ratio, Swiss Solvency Test ratio, US risk-based capital
- Investment portfolio: Total investments and allocation by asset class, with the valuation basis stated (market value or IFRS carrying value)
- Capital generation: Cash remittances to the holding company, operating capital generation
- Capital deployment: Dividend per share, share buybacks, acquisitions
- Insurance platform: Insurance earnings and new business volumes; insurance liabilities, insurer investment assets, AUM from owned or affiliated insurers, third-party insurance AUM, ownership
Evidence required
Financial statements, solvency and financial condition reports, and official transaction announcements.
03
Compare and interpret the business model
Principal questions
- Which measures can be compared with peers, and which are the company's own?
- Where does its model differ from comparable companies, and what is changing?
Evidence required
The figures in steps 1 and 2, compared only where definitions, accounting bases and regulatory regimes match.
04
Assess the implications
Principal questions
- What does the evidence suggest about the company's position and the drivers of its value creation?
- What is uncertain, what evidence points the other way, and what deserves attention next?
Evidence required
The compiled evidence, interpreted in each profile's Investor View and labelled as inference or thesis.
B
How assessments are made
- Periods
- A full year is compared only with the prior full year, and a first half only with the prior first half. Half-year and full-year figures are never compared with each other. Point-in-time measures, such as solvency ratios, carry the date they refer to and are compared only with other point-in-time values.
- Changes
- Changes are calculated from the two values shown. Ratios change in percentage points, never as a percentage of a percentage. A percentage change is not calculated across a loss or a zero value, because it would not be meaningful.
- Definitions and bases
- Every metric carries the company's own label, a plain definition, its unit and its accounting or regulatory basis. Measures on different bases, such as IFRS 17 insurance revenue and gross written premiums, or Swiss Solvency Test and Solvency II ratios, are not treated as the same measure.
- Missing data
- Where a period or figure is not available, the profile shows the latest available period and states the gap. Missing reported figures are never estimated, interpolated or filled from other sources.
- Estimates and calculations
- A calculated figure must state its formula and an estimate must state its basis, or the site will not build. No profile currently contains an estimate.
- From figures to interpretation
- Interpretation is confined to the Investor View at the end of each profile. It must name drivers, principal uncertainties, material counter-evidence and what to watch, and it is labelled as inference (following from the figures and sources) or thesis (a broader proposition that can be challenged). Common recommendation phrases, such as buy, sell or hold ratings, price targets and overweight or underweight calls, fail the build in every kind of content; the check is a fixed list of phrases, not a substitute for editorial review.
- Asset managers with insurance activities
- Insurance liabilities, insurer investment assets, general-account assets, assets managed for owned or affiliated insurers, third-party insurance AUM, insurance earnings and ownership interests are different measures. Each figure states which it is, and they are never added together or compared with each other.
Metric groups by business model
There is no single scorecard. A profile uses only the groups that apply to the company's business model; the site will not build if a metric is placed in a group that does not apply.
| Group | Applies to | Comparability |
|---|---|---|
| Scale and revenue | Composite insurer (property & casualty and life); Life and retirement insurer; Property & casualty insurer; Reinsurer; Insurance-led holding company | Within an accounting basis only. IFRS 17 insurance revenue and gross written premiums are not the same measure. |
| Earnings | Composite insurer (property & casualty and life); Life and retirement insurer; Property & casualty insurer; Reinsurer; Insurance-led holding company | Net income is broadly comparable within an accounting basis. Operating measures are company-defined. |
| Underwriting | Composite insurer (property & casualty and life); Property & casualty insurer; Reinsurer | P&C and reinsurance only, and only where definitions match. |
| Life and retirement | Composite insurer (property & casualty and life); Life and retirement insurer | Mostly company-defined; CSM is comparable only under IFRS 17. |
| Returns | Composite insurer (property & casualty and life); Life and retirement insurer; Property & casualty insurer; Reinsurer; Insurance-led holding company | Company-defined numerators and equity bases. Not compared unless definitions match. |
| Solvency and capital position | Composite insurer (property & casualty and life); Life and retirement insurer; Property & casualty insurer; Reinsurer | Within one regulatory regime only. Regimes are calibrated differently. |
| Balance sheet | Composite insurer (property & casualty and life); Life and retirement insurer; Property & casualty insurer; Reinsurer; Insurance-led holding company | Comparable only within one accounting basis; unit-linked assets and liabilities distort totals between insurers. |
| Private-market investments | Composite insurer (property & casualty and life); Life and retirement insurer; Property & casualty insurer; Reinsurer; Insurance-led holding company | Classifications differ widely between insurers; categories not separately disclosed are marked, never estimated. |
| Investment portfolio | Composite insurer (property & casualty and life); Life and retirement insurer; Property & casualty insurer; Reinsurer; Insurance-led holding company | Allocation shares are comparable only where asset-class definitions and valuation bases match. |
| Capital generation | Composite insurer (property & casualty and life); Life and retirement insurer; Property & casualty insurer; Reinsurer; Insurance-led holding company | Company-defined. Not compared. |
| Capital deployment | Composite insurer (property & casualty and life); Life and retirement insurer; Property & casualty insurer; Reinsurer; Insurance-led holding company | Amounts are factual; their adequacy is a matter of interpretation. |
| Insurance platform | Alternative asset manager with insurance activities | Each figure states which of these it measures. They are never added together or compared with each other. |
Comparability labels
- Peer-comparable
- Same definition across the selected peer group.
- Within business model
- Comparable only between companies with the same business model.
- Company-defined
- The company's own measure. Not compared across companies.
Insurance exposure of asset managers
- Insurance liabilities
- Insurer investment assets
- General-account assets
- Third-party assets under management
- Ownership interest and economic exposure
- Asset-manager AUM from an owned or affiliated insurer
- New insurance business volumes
- Insurance earnings
Scores
The platform publishes no numerical scores, ratings or rankings. Scoring has been deferred until at least five full profiles can be compared. If scores are introduced, this page will publish their dimensions, rating anchors, calculation rules, evidence requirements and limits of comparability, and the underlying metrics will remain visible beside them.
C
Evidence standards
- Reported fact
- Directly supported by a cited source, with the period and, for figures, the page or table.
- WhereEvery figure marked Reported; the reported facts of each signal.
- Calculated metric
- Derived from reported values using a documented formula.
- WhereYear-on-year changes and composition shares, which are calculated from the values shown.
- Estimate
- An approximate value with a stated basis. Never used to fill a gap in reported figures.
- WhereNone at present.
- Inference
- An interpretation that follows from the available evidence.
- WhereInvestor Views labelled inference; signal interpretations marked Supported.
- Thesis
- A broader analytical proposition that may rest on several pieces of evidence and can be challenged.
- WhereAnalytical subjects in the Industry Pulse; signal interpretations marked Hypothesis; Investor Views labelled thesis.
How sources are linked to claims
Each figure links to a numbered source in the profile's source list, with the page or table it was taken from. A source must have a title, a valid https link to the original document, a publisher and a publication date. Figures and signals are refused when the site is built if any of these is missing, whether or not the record has been approved.
Uncertainty and missing evidence
Every signal states what remains uncertain, and every Investor View states its principal uncertainties and material counter-evidence. Missing periods are listed as gaps.
- Supported
- Every element of the interpretation is stated in, or follows directly from, the linked sources. No motive or trend is asserted that the sources do not state.
- Hypothesis
- The interpretation goes beyond what the sources state, for example a motive, a pattern across firms or an expected effect. It is a reading to be tested, not a finding.
Figure basis labels in use: Reported (printed in the cited source.); Calculated (derived from reported values with the stated formula.); Estimate (approximate, with a stated basis.)
D
Where signals come from
Not monitored continuously
There is no continuous, automated or scheduled monitoring, and no paid subscription is used.
Checked periodically
Developments are identified through periodic checks, primary sources first: companies' investor-relations and press pages, securities filings and regulators' publications, supplemented by searches of news coverage.
Used to verify
Every material claim in a signal is checked against the primary source before it is published: the company's own announcement, a regulatory filing or an official transaction document.
Primary sources cited today
Generated from the sources the published content actually cites. A media report may prompt research, but no signal relies on one for a material claim, and no trade or specialist publication is currently cited.
| Publisher | Kind of source | In signals | All content |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zurich Insurance Groupzurich.com | Transaction, Results, Filing, Investor presentation, Other source, Regulatory | 9 | 33 |
| Zurich Insurance Group and Beazley (joint announcement)zurich.com | Transaction | 4 | 12 |
| Clearbrook Group Services Inc., on Brookfield's careers site (Workday)brookfield.wd5.myworkdayjobs.com | Other source | 4 | 4 |
| Aegonaegon.com | Transaction | 3 | 14 |
| Legal & Generalgroup.legalandgeneral.com | Transaction | 2 | 13 |
| AXAaxa.com | Transaction, Press release | 2 | 11 |
| ERGO (Munich Re)ergo.com | Transaction | 2 | 11 |
| Allianz SE (investor relations)allianz.com | Transaction | 2 | 10 |
| KKR & Co. Inc., via SEC EDGARsec.gov | Filing, Results | 1 | 8 |
| Apollo Global Management, via SEC EDGARsec.gov | Results, Filing | 1 | 7 |
| Prudential Financial (investor relations)investor.prudential.com | Transaction | 1 | 6 |
| Avivaaviva.com | Transaction | 1 | 5 |
| Apollo Global Managementapollo.com | Other source | 1 | 4 |
| Equitable Holdings, via SEC EDGARsec.gov | Filing | 1 | 4 |
| Clearbrook Group Holdings Inc. (formerly Argo Group)argogroup.com | Other source | 1 | 2 |
| Corebridge Financial, via SEC EDGARsec.gov | Filing | 1 | 1 |
| LinkedInlinkedin.com | Other source | 1 | 1 |
| Brookfield Wealth Solutions, via SEC EDGARsec.gov | Results, Filing, Transaction | – | 4 |
| Brookfield Wealth Solutionsbnt.brookfield.com | Results | – | 2 |
| Brookfield Corporationbn.brookfield.com | Investor presentation | – | 1 |
| Brookfield Corporation, via SEC EDGARsec.gov | Filing | – | 1 |
17 publishers cited by signals; 21 across all content.
What is not yet in place
A defined list of the sources checked, and how often, will be published here once those checks are in regular use. Until then, this page does not describe any source as monitored.
E
Updates and corrections
Publication cadence
The intended rhythm, carried out by hand. It is a working practice, not a service commitment, and nothing is updated automatically.
Signals: weekly review
Each week the covered companies' announcements are reviewed. A signal is published only when a development is material; a quiet week produces no new signal rather than a minor one.
Financials: event-driven
Profile figures and capital-markets records are updated after results, capital actions or transactions, once the company's own documents are available and each figure has been checked against its page.
Events: rolling six months
The events calendar covers the next six months and is re-checked against each company's investor calendar weekly. Each entry shows when it was last checked; an entry not re-checked within two weeks is marked for re-checking.
- Company profiles and financial periods
- Figures are compiled with AI assistance from each company's reports, and each is checked against the cited page. Each profile states the date it was compiled and the latest full-year and half-year periods available then. Quantitative profiles exist so far for Zurich, Apollo, KKR, Brookfield. Target cadence, not yet in regular operation: a quarterly review, and a review after material results or announcements. These are targets, not commitments. Nothing updates automatically.
- Material changes
- A material development is recorded as a signal with its own date. Where an earlier development moves materially, the signal records the later development and its date alongside the original.
- Corrections
- Errors are corrected in the record itself. A public corrections log has not yet been established.
- Reporting an issue or suggesting a source
- A channel for reporting factual issues and suggesting sources has not yet been set up. It will be added before the platform launches.
See also questions about the platform.
